RIP: Depth of Field

[DP]

Here are a couple of images I use for my classes:

[deckeda]

I'm thinking of the picket fence image from (any?) camera book, that shows various parts in focus, or not, based on aperture. It's a good example because the subject matter is one we're already familiar with describing length well.

[SDGuy]

Dakota wrote:

I miss having this on my lenses...

[Mac1337]

Nothing like a metal and glass camera. So much of the joy of photography is fondling the camera itself.

[Paul F.]

We're teetering on the verge of "too much information" here man...

[Inactive]

Here's a cool product. Will also make DoF clear

http://www.lensalign.com/

O-

[lafinfil]

Paul F. wrote:
We're teetering on the verge of "too much information" here man...

two words ...... Scheimpflug principle

: -)

[pRICE cUBE]

lafinfil wrote:
[quote=Paul F.]
We're teetering on the verge of "too much information" here man...

two words ...... Scheimpflug principle

: -)



Bless you.

[Paul F.]

Don't worry...
I always keep my head directly behind the rear sight iris...


(and Racer; Darn right! It's amazing how clear and sharp properly adjusted rear and front sight irises can make things! Of course, it takes a lot of fiddling to get the right settings!).

[OWC Jamie]

I LOL'd

two words ...... Scheimpflug principle

: -)