Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there?

[Black]

NSFW, if you work in a nunnery or maybe a mosque...
http://www.whatsonxiamen.com/ent6734.html

[$tevie]

I think establishing that Kate goes commando qualifies as "need to know" information, don't you think? Your priorities seem a bit skewed.

[Racer X]

yes. Any pics of Auntie Fergie's bum back in the day?

[eustacetilley]

This is utterly unimportant, so I was going to go with the absurd:




But then I noticed who the photos are credited to.

This might actually get weird.

[spoiler=The Duchess vs. The Princess?]
"The image was taken by photographer Diane Von Furstenberg during the recent Royal tour of Australia, who captured the revealing shot after wind from a helicopter blew up Kate’s skirt whilst her and the Prince were visiting the Blue Mountains near Sydney."
[/spoiler]



Eustace

[Black]

So, on the commando topic.... was going to ask.... wouldn't one typically wear some sort of undergarment with such a skirt? Or is it possible she has one and it's just not visible?

[DeusxMac]

Photoshop

[OWC Jamie]

Black wrote:
So, on the commando topic.... was going to ask.... wouldn't one typically wear some sort of undergarment with such a skirt? Or is it possible she has one and it's just not visible?

Just not visible.
Bonus shot, bonus pay for some tabloids that know it will garner clicks/views kinda like this thread.

[N-OS X-tasy!]

$tevie wrote:
I think establishing that Kate goes commando qualifies as "need to know" information, don't you think? Your priorities seem a bit skewed.

More likely wearing a thong.

[3d]

I saw the pic before. Sure I'll glance at it again. Thanks

[WHiiP]

N-OS X-tasy! wrote:
[quote=$tevie]
I think establishing that Kate goes commando qualifies as "need to know" information, don't you think? Your priorities seem a bit skewed.

More likely wearing a thong.

:agree: