DNC emails leaks about Sanders going to mean anything?

[deckeda]

max wrote:
.. Sanders was much better choice....

Perhaps, but he's no longer running.

Look forward, much?

[vision63]

Filliam H. Muffman wrote:
[quote=vision63]
[quote=Filliam H. Muffman]
With all the super delegates throwing in for Clinton before the primaries even started, it was rigged from the start. Bernie had a surprisingly good result. I think he got off to a late start because he didn't believe he had a chance. Things like the voter suppression in NY with a 6 month lead time to switch from Independent to Democrat made it even harder. The Clinton campaign and the DNC working together against him was just another thumb on the scale.

Liquors must have drunkened you. Hillary Clinton got 3.7 million more votes than Sanders. Here's a primer on how she defeated him lest you should ever become confused again.

How Clinton Won
How Hillary Clinton overcame the challenge from Sen. Bernie Sanders
http://graphics.wsj.com/elections/2016/how-clinton-won/
"Those results, along with her struggle to beat Mr. Sanders among white voters overall, could suggest a weakness in the general election. Republicans tend to win white voters, and presumed GOP nominee Donald Trump is particularly strong among lower-income white voters."

Clinton struggled to beat Bernie.

The System Isn’t ‘Rigged’ Against Sanders
Clinton’s winning because more Democrats want her to be the nominee.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-...t-sanders/

Nate Silver Explains Why Clinton Will Be Democratic Nominee – It’s Not A Rigged System
Hillary Clinton will be the nominee because more Democrats voted for her because she is a "hard core liberal" and not because of a rigged system.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/06/09/n...ystem.html

More Democrats want her to win. It ignores all the Independents that wanted to vote for Bernie but couldn't because of voter suppression. I predict that Clinton is going to have a very hard time in November, and part of it will be because of how the DNC has treated Independent voters.
BS with a capital BS. Any so called Independent was free to register as Democrats in order to vote. Or do you think they were too stupid to think of that? Also you're just speculating how they would have voted. Hillary dusted his ass off. Period. It's history and it's on the books.

[Filliam H. Muffman]

vision63 wrote:
It's history and it's on the books.

That's the only thing I agree with.

[$tevie]

As far as I am concerned, Bernie's awesome speech last night is the end of the chatter and angst and the beginning of the battle to keep Trump out of the White House. I still <3 Bernie; he's an amazing blend of idealism and pragmatism and the Gold Standard for politicians.

[vision63]

max wrote:
[quote=Lemon Drop]
What about this charge from the Clinton campaign that Russians are behind the hack of the DNC because they want Trump to win?

That's a bit of a stretch without presenting evidence, but it does acknowledge that they know these emails are very damaging.

Clinton camp desperation sinking to another low level.
Her numbers are sinking this week, two separate polls and she is in a tie with Trump, trending down.

The Democrats did it all by themselves, Sanders was much better choice....
Apparently, you are never right.

[Lux Interior]

vision63 wrote: Apparently, you are never right.

He makes up for it with humility and graciousness.

[max]

deckeda wrote:
[quote=max]
.. Sanders was much better choice....

Perhaps, but he's no longer running.

Look forward, much?
Oh, yes, another corrupt warmongering neocon as your candidate.
We could have had a principled man of ideas, yet this was your choice.....

[Lux Interior]

Do you stay up all night looking for old threads to support your conspiracy theories?

[RgrF]

He does it to piss off posters who think they missed something of importance, had they known it was a max post they'd have known it wasn't.