|
Mucking around on TireRack.com
|
02-07-2007, 03:19 AM
M A V I C's thread brought me there.
http://tinyurl.com/2apvzz ^ hope that works ^ I assumed (wrongly?) that "Ultra High Performance All-Season" tires would cost more than "High Performance All-Season", but that's not so? Is that strange?
02-07-2007, 03:35 AM
[quote billb]
:-) The question remains, though.
02-07-2007, 03:47 AM
From the URL, it looks like you're comparing AVON something with B F Goodrich something.
$$ for rubber compound wear formulations seemed to be the cost factor last time I was comparing tires.
02-07-2007, 04:18 AM
I get it now when you buy hundreds of dollars of tires they give a few cookies making the deal unbeatable.
02-07-2007, 04:20 AM
&manufacturers=
Avon BFGoodrich Bridgestone Continental Dunlop Firestone Fuzion General Goodyear Hankook Kumho Michelin Pirelli Sumitomo Uniroyal Yokohama &x=19&y=9# Without knowing what car you chose and the basic category, nobody has a chance to figure what the frack you are talking about. 
02-07-2007, 04:59 AM
[quote Greg the dogsitter]
:-) The question remains, though. Honestly, I would agree that would be a reasonable expectation until one finds that's not the case. :-) Edit: BTW, your session has timed out.
02-07-2007, 04:59 AM
[quote Filliam H. Muffman]Without knowing what car you chose and the basic category, nobody has a chance to figure what the frack you are talking about.
Righto. This'd be for my 2000 Civic Si. The Kumho ECSTA ASX are only $60, and come with high ratings. They're classified as Ultra High Performance All-Season tires. Then there's the Michelin Pilot Exalto A/S, $125 each, with ratings that are a smidge better, and those're classified as High Performance All-Season. What's the difference? I understand some pricing spread, but twice as much?
02-07-2007, 04:59 AM
And I'm going to sleep now. No need to answer immediately. :-)
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
