02-22-2009, 05:54 PM
read above about the "my way or the highway" attitude that existed. And which never worked.
|
Clinton states, "Human rights can wait"
|
02-23-2009, 01:15 PM
NeverMind wrote:What are you talking about? 300,000 dead, bazillions spent, foreign relations in the crapper, but hey! It worked with Saddam. Just ask him! 
02-23-2009, 05:37 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNopQq5lWqQ
not everyone is partying like it's 1995 right now. China, the world's top holder of U.S. debt, wants to ensure liquidity and security in its dealings with U.S. treasury bonds.the money cards beats a full house every time
02-24-2009, 03:26 PM
Seems to me that we've had a "Clinton" in power at the most elite levels of government for sixteen continuous years. For Hillary, it's been eight years of shaping public opinion and presidential influence as First Lady, then another eight years living on the hog and shaping legislation as a Senator.
02-25-2009, 07:58 AM
Mac-A-Matic wrote: How droll. How many years have we had a "Bush" in power on the public payroll? Prescott Bush was elected to the Senate when? About 1950 and was on the public payroll for few years before that.
02-25-2009, 02:52 PM
My response was about the Clintons but since you ventured the question the answer is the Bush's have been in public life and sucking at the public teat longer than the Kennedys.
02-25-2009, 03:33 PM
RgrF wrote: Gee RgrF, I guess your cock is bigger than mine. Is your line of thinking on this that the Bushes are culpable because they've had influence in government for such a long time? That Chinese Human Rights have not been a priority because of the Bushes? Do you offer the Bushes as an excuse for sixteen years of Clinton power? As an excuse for their failings? Are you really telling us that the Clinton's shortcomings are okay because the Bushes have been in position for a longer period of time> |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)