Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tripp Lite saves the day (and the iMac...)
#1
Client calls this morning asking if Tripp Lite UPS is OK after taking a hit in yesterday's thunderstorm. No lights, but power still on some of the outlets. Told him to go back to Costco and get another one for $99, or go to Fry's and get the APC 1500VA for $119 AR. Took him a few minutes to realize that the unit did what it was supposed to do; sacrifice itself to save the computer and hard drives attached to it. Don't remember whether the Costco Tripp Lite's had 2 year or 3 year warranties... it's real close if it's 2, plenty safe if it's 3. Told him to get printout from Costco if he goes there, but that Fry's APC unit has 50% more "power" for the twenty bucks difference (plus MIR hassle). Another believer in the world for UPS's.
Reply
#2
Yep did exactly what it's intended to - take a bullet (er, lightning bolt).

Another great way to do that is to have an electrician install one of these:


http://products.schneider-electric.us/pr...ductDetail&countryCode=us&partNumber=QO2175SB

Depending on the breaker panel you have, they are available for a good majority of brands now. They take a hit and can save the whole house Smile
Reply
#3
Thanks for the link Jamie!
Reply
#4
Most UPS's say to not install them behind another surge suppressor... would the whole house goodie be an exception?
Reply
#5
Buzz wrote:
Client calls this morning asking if Tripp Lite UPS is OK after taking a hit in yesterday's thunderstorm. No lights, but power still on some of the outlets. Told him to go back to Costco and get another one for $99, or go to Fry's and get the APC 1500VA for $119 AR. Took him a few minutes to realize that the unit did what it was supposed to do; sacrifice itself to save the computer and hard drives attached to it. Don't remember whether the Costco Tripp Lite's had 2 year or 3 year warranties... it's real close if it's 2, plenty safe if it's 3. Told him to get printout from Costco if he goes there, but that Fry's APC unit has 50% more "power" for the twenty bucks difference (plus MIR hassle). Another believer in the world for UPS's.
Local company, pass the HQ from time to time; good to hear.
Reply
#6
I just got back from Costco with the $90 Tripp Lite. I would have gone for the Fry's $120 after rebate deal, but the closest Fry's to me is a 2 1/2 hour round trip. Anyway the Tripp Lite 1000VA/500watt will do me for a while.
Reply
#7
Buzz wrote: Most UPS's say to not install them behind another surge suppressor... would the whole house goodie be an exception?
First learn what protectors do. And what the problems are.

For example, a UPS output is typically so 'dirty' as to harm small motors and power strip protectors. So UPS manufacturers recommend no power strip on its output. They ‘forget' to mention why. They hope you *assume*. Assume that a UPS output is cleaner power.

Because electronics are so robust, then 'dirty' power from a UPS in battery backup mode is also ideal 'clean enough' power to electronics. Electronics are that robust.

A tiny surge also cannot harm electronics. But the same tiny surge will easily destroy ineffective power strip protectors. Grossly undersizing gets the naive to claim, "My power strip sacrificed itself to save my computer." Nonsense, Even manufacturer numeric specs do not claim that protection. If it fails – which means no protection - then a naive consumer will jump to conclusions based only on observation (which is junk science). That failure means a protector disconnected from a surge as fast as possible. Left that surge connected to a nearby appliance. The appliance protected itself. Again, electronics must be so robust as to not be harmed by surges even from a UPS in battery backup mode. A surge too tiny to harm electronics easily destroyed a power strip protector.

MOV data sheets are quite blunt. An MOV that fails catastrophically violates manufacturer’s absolute maximum parameters. But grossly undersizing (violating the data sheets) causes consumers to convert assumptions into fact. Reality: a protector circuit disconnects from a surge as fast as possible to avoid a house fire. A surge was left connected to that appliance. The appliance protected itself.

In any facility that can never have surge damage, power strips are not used. They need protection; not a profit center. Instead, a 'whole house' protector is earthed. The numbers: lightning is typically 20,000 amps. So a minimally sized ‘whole house’ protector starts at 50,000 amps. Effective protectors do not fail. Do not promote a scam. Earth even direct lightning strikes and remain functional.

Effective protection means nobody knows a surge existed. But naïve consumers cannot recommend it. The most naïve must see damage. A damaged protector means it was grossly undersized – ineffective. And also promotes sales. Grossly undersizing also means an obscene profit margin. Why would anyone waste money on a protector that 1) does not claim that protection, 2) is so grossly undersized as to disconnect ASAP, and 3) costs tens or 100 times more money? Knowledge from observation is classic junk science. That junk science reasoning gets a majority to recommend a high profit and ineffective protector.

One ‘whole house’ protector for about $1 per protected appliance. So that even direct lightning strikes cause no damage. Why would anyone waste $90 on a protector so grossly undersized as to fail on a surge too tiny to harm anything else? Advertising (also called propaganda) replaces education and science.

More responsible companies provide a superior solution. A solution necessary to even protect grossly undersized power strip protectors. General Electric, Leviton, ABB, Siemens, Square D, Polyphaser, and Intermatic are a few sources. A Cutler-Hammer solution sells in Lowes and Home Depot for less than $50.

Why would anyone spend $90 on a protector that does not even claim surge protection in its numeric specs? Take a $3 power strip. Add some ten cent protector parts. It sells in a supermarket for $7. Or sell a similar circuit for $90. It costs more. That proves it is top-quality? Myths are that easily promoted. Only the fewer and informed consumers divert less money into actual protection. Earth one ‘whole house’ protector. Then even direct lightning strikes do not harm a protector.

This discussed the protector. Not discussed yet is what actually does all protection. Or why. Above demonstrates what a majority would not know. 100 years of well proven science. Advertisers have it easy. It is a surge protector. That proves it must be surge protection? Nonsense. That only proves how soundbytes promote scams. Protector and protection are two completely different items in a surge protection 'system'.

One ‘whole house’ protector costs about $1 per protected appliance. Is sized to even earth direct lightning strikes without failure. Does not have an obscene profit margin. Is how protection is done where damage cannot happen. How protection was done even 100 years ago. And what is necessary to even protect power strip protectors. Effective protection means nobody even knows a surge existed. $90 for a protector so grossly undersized as to fail? Scam.
Reply
#8
Westom has been coming here to do nothing but rant against UPSs for quite awhile, usually confusing UPSs with simple surge suppressors.

He's not outright spamming, but it's clear that he's only here to diss UPSs and not to enter into any real discussion.

For example, here's one of "Doc's" threads that he butted into:
http://forums.macresource.com/read.php?1...sg-1085012

And it was pointed out when he first logged on in 2009 that he's posted similar rants all over the 'net.

'Not sure whether he's employed by someone manufacturing competitive devices or what, but he's definitely attempting to saturate Google's results for UPS devices with his irrational rants against them.

Does this merit banning him?
Reply
#9
Chakravartin wrote:
Westom has been coming here to do nothing but rant against UPSs for quite awhile,
Chakravartin is posting cheapshot atttacks because he cannot read what is posted. There was no rant on a UPS. A UPS in battery backup mode demonstrates that all electronics are so robust.

Chakravartin could not read what was posted. Facts were too technical. He only saw what his emotions wanted him to see. Attack the messenger. Those least able to comprehend technical stuff do cheapshots.

A UPS output is typically so 'dirty' as to harm small electric motors and power strip protectors. Protection already inside electronics is so robust as to make that into ideal 'clean' power. Where is that a rant against a UPS? It isn't. Demonstrated is that electronics are so robust. Apparently it was too complex for Chakravartin. So he again becomes emotional. So he posts personal attacks. Posts personal attacks because he did not even read what was posted. Is this board moderated? Chakravartin demonstrates why it should be.
Reply
#10
Achem...

http://forums.macresource.com/search.php..._threads=0
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)