Playboy model sentenced for invasion of privacy

[pRICE cUBE]

Model Dani Mathers, whose haughty posting of a photo of a naked woman at her gym sparked outrage last summer, will be punished by spending a month removing graffiti in Los Angeles. Mathers pleaded no contest to a charge of invading the 70-year-old woman's privacy.

"That was absolutely wrong and not what I meant to do. I know that body-shaming is wrong," she said, as member station KPCC reported. "That is not the type of person I am."

Mathers, 30, was Playboy's 2015 Playmate of the Year. She was banned by the LA Fitness health club chain for surreptitiously taking a photo of a woman in a shower area and publishing it along with the caption, "If I can't unsee this then you can't either."

When it announced the ban, LA Fitness called Mathers' behavior "appalling." Saying it had revoked her membership, the company added, "It's not just our rule, it's common decency."

In the fallout that ensued, the model also lost her job at Los Angeles radio station KLOS, where she was a contributor. In November, the criminal charge was filed that exposed Mathers to a potential six-month jail term.

[Paul F.]

A months community service works for me...
If I can't take pictures of her in the locker room, then she can't take pictures of anyone there either.

/humor

Appropriate sentence for invasion of privacy.

[Kraniac]

That is SICK and speaks of some seriously deep issues with this person..a month of community service? She should go to jail for a month and then go clean graffiti off of walls...bullshit

[cbelt3]

When will the civil suit strip the young lady of the rest of her earnings ?

[freeradical]

This woman probably doesn't like, mom, apple pie, and baseball.

I bet she hates puppies too.

[OWC Jamie]

So, she has to spend a month stripping walls naked.



( What a difference a comma makes )

[Numo]

What she did was very cruel, but she got hammered pretty hard for doing it.

[ztirffritz]

I think that's fair. If I remember correctly, she didn't show the person's face, but still, that's just a poor poor life choice.

[pRICE cUBE]

ztirffritz wrote:
I think that's fair. If I remember correctly, she didn't show the person's face, but still, that's just a poor poor life choice.

My understanding os that it was identifiable enough that the victim's identity was figured out.

[vision63]

Kraniac wrote:
That is SICK and speaks of some seriously deep issues with this person..a month of community service? She should go to jail for a month and then go clean graffiti off of walls...bullshit

No, her sentence should be to come over and invade my privacy.