Leopard apparently delayed

[clay]

http://www.tuaw.com/2007/04/12/apple-ann...he-iphone/

true? who knows. just thought I'd share.

{edit} apparently true: http://www.apple.com/hotnews/

[Go To Top]

.

[LaserKun]

Yes, it is true; you can read about it here:

http://www.apple.com/hotnews/

No problem for me, I can't get a new Mac until at least then anyway, and I do not want to buy Leopard for my present Macs...they are probably too old.

[RAMd®d]

I bet if a Mac is *good* enough for Tiger, it's good enough for Leopard.

[OWC Jamie]

[endymion]

[quote RAMd®d]I bet if a Mac is *good* enough for Tiger, it's good enough for Leopard.
Well, it's good enough unless it's only got a G3... g=

[Chupa Chupa]

Apple's press release is bordering on M$ shirkiness. Seems VERY odd that Leopard has been planned all this time and parallel with the iPhone project and JUST RECENTLY Apple had to divert resources. Apple first said Leopard would ship before Vista. Then Apple said Spring '07 (which they reiterated at MacWorld and the Q1 financial results conference call). Memories of Copeland dancing in my head.

I suspect the developers WWDC beta release is going to be a lot buggier than Apple is letting on. All I can say is after all this Leopard needs to be rock solid in Oct or Apple is going to have a lot of egg on it's face. I guess this also means there won't be a iLife '07. Does it also mean that Apple consumer products now take priority over Mac projects?

[sscutchen]

AppleFan is gonna have to eat a lot of M$ crow...

[C(-)ris]

Why would they take people off Tiger for a stupid phone that caters to a significantly smaller amount of people than 10.5.

[RAMd®d]

Why would they take people off Tiger for a stupid phone that caters to a significantly smaller amount of people than 10.5.

Probably because the iPhone may generate a *lot* more revenue than some stupid OS upgrade.