Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PAYING the piper!. . .currently, the 2 highest paid actresses are. . .
#1
. . .Reese Witherspoon and Angelina Jolie. . .

. . .to bad talent isn't necessarily a prerequisite. . .not that any of these actresses are not talented but why are not many 'real' actresses like Meryl Streep even in the top 10?

I guess it is all about money? (although Halle has been on a 'Nicholas Cage roll' with a lot of box office stinkers. . .)


Reese Witherspoon, Angelina Jolie Top Actress Pay Scale
Cameron Diaz and Nicole Kidman follow


Reese Witherspoon and Angelina Jolie are Hollywood's most desirable leading ladies, at least if you measure by paycheck.

According to the annual list of the industry's top-paid actresses compiled in The Hollywood Reporter, Witherspoon and Jolie rule the roost with a reported asking price of between $15-to-20 million per picture.

The trade paper is quick to note that while Witherspoon and Jolie might take reduced rates for a passion project like Witherspoon's fall dud "Rendition" or Jolie's "A Mighty Heart," the actresses command big bucks for projects in their creative wheelhouses. That would include romantic comedies for Witherspoon and features like "Mr. & Mrs. Smith" for Jolie.

Jolie, for example, will likely make full price for upcoming features like "Wanted" and "The Changeling," while the trades have previously both reported and accepted denials that Witherspoon was being paid $29 million for Universal's "Our Family Trouble."

Coming in third was Cameron Diaz, whose asking price is also more than $15 million, a figure skewed by the whopping $30 million the actress reportedly took in for just voicing a character in "Shrek the Third."

Despite a prodigious string of box office underperformers, last year's No. 2 Nicole Kidman slipped only to No. 4 with a price of between $10-and-15 million. Kidman continues to alternate between big budget studio projects like likely meet her asking prices ("Invasion" and the upcoming "The Golden Compass") and indies like "Margot at the Wedding," where she presumably takes far less.

Following Kidman are Renee Zellweger, Sandra Bullock and former highest paid actress Julia Roberts, who also make between $10-and-15 million.

The Top 10 is rounded out by Drew Barrymore, Jodie Foster and Halle Berry.

The Hollywood Reporter notes that a slew of young actresses are right on the cusp of the list and that another year of projects could prove if the likes of Katherine Heigl, Rachel McAdams and Jennifer Garner will be able join the esteemed ranks.



Another article at the NY Times on this:

_____________________________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Reply
#2
Nicole Kidman is definitely a real actress--check out "The Hours"
Reply
#3
what does a person do with 30 million bucks? and what if they do a couple of moives a year/

few million on a couple of homes and you still have 20+ left...
Reply
#4
> why are no 'real' actresses like Meryl Streep even in the top 10?

What's a "real" actress?

Of that list, I think that Nicole Kidman and Jodie Foster might be "real" actresses. I'm not fond of their choices lately, but I give them credit for chops.

I wouldn't say that Streep has displayed any special talent lately. I haven't enjoyed her in any role for quite some time. Looking back over her IMDB profile, the last genuinely engaging role that I saw her in (IMHO) was "Postcards from the Edge" in 1990.

'Seems like these days she's a better narrator or v/o character actress than screen actress.

Does Streep-the-actress really justify the big bucks anymore?
Reply
#5
Ahhhhh, the classic argument between 'art' and 'commercial success'.

Sir Alec made less than Mark Hamill, don't y' know.
Reply
#6
I doubt "talent" sells a majority of tickets at Regal and AMC/Loews.
Reply
#7
[quote cbelt3]Ahhhhh, the classic argument between 'art' and 'commercial success'.

Sir Alec made less than Mark Hamill, don't y' know.
But the old Jedi was wise enough to negotiate 2% of the gross.
Reply
#8
Those numbers are nebulous; there's a lot of ifs and whens involved. And Reese Witherspoon is a smart woman: her production company produced the sequel to Legally Blonde, which was how she managed to make so much money on a movie that stalled the second week out. Doesn't hurt that she's a good actress, too. As are Jolie and Diaz and Kidman and Zellwegger. They may not be lions like Streep, but they belong on the big screen.
Reply
#9
Jolie has not made one good, really good picture. I don't think she can act at all. Her films are all stupid fluff pictures, not one of substance.




I do think she is very sexy.

Reese is not any better. She was good in one picture, "Walk the Line"
Reply
#10
Kidman amd Jodie Foster are the only true Actress of the bunch and takes risks.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)