Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So... yeah.... 'Seems there was statutory rape and child abuse
#1
Remember last week when there were 416 children taken away from the Texas polygamy cult?

I heard on NPR today that ever since authorities spread the word that underage mothers could remain with their babies in foster care, women who previously claimed to be 19 or 20 years old have started producing evidence that they are 17 or younger.

So, the count of infants taken from the ranch is now at 462. Many of them are mothers.

'Found this to substantiate it a bit.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iIdMp...QD908FN1G0

...and yeah. I'm calling them a "cult" now. "Sect" is too polite.
Reply
#2
Did you hear whether or not they decided to implant chips in them for future tracking?
Have they been able to arrange for individual pens yet, or are they still corralled in one big one?
Reply
#3
They are in the process of moving out children to foster homes as they continue to investigate the abuse charges. Also doing DNA testing to see if they can unravel some of the family relationships of the children to mothers and fathers.
Reply
#4
>>Also doing DNA testing to see if they can unravel some of the family relationships of the children to mothers and fathers.

That would be an interesting diagram to see
Reply
#5
[quote mattkime]>>Also doing DNA testing to see if they can unravel some of the family relationships of the children to mothers and fathers.

That would be an interesting diagram to see
Maybe they will have a touring exhibit including such a diagram, along with actual specimens from the big catch.
Reply
#6
Jesus. I don't even allow my eyes to linger on the headlines, much less the stories themselves.
Reply
#7
Oddly, the leftists are quiet about this, because this is the fascism they enjoy.
This is a travesty. There is no way in the world that I could possibly agree with much of
anything this cult espouses but the idea that these children will be better off being bought up
in the toxic atmosphere and culture facing children in present day America is insane.
Granted FLDS is not going to win any awards for integrity or honesty. But it still gives me
a pause to think that on the flimsiest of excuses, the state of Texas is all ready to violate
individual Civil Rights. I don't particularly like the FLDS, but I personally hope they sue
the Hell out of Texas!
Reply
#8
I agree 100% with Shakeman. So there.

Unfortunately these folks believe that government is of the devil, and will not be seeking any additional contact beyond what's thrust upon them.
Reply
#9
"the idea that these children will be better off being bought up
in the toxic atmosphere and culture facing children in present day America is insane."

Really. Let me make sure we have your sentiment understood correctly. Millions of parents who raise children in America, including people who adopt, and those who care for foster children--according to your description--are bringing children up in a "toxic environment" just by being in "present day" America?

Which version of America do you think is less "toxic" that they should be raised in, other than "present day" America? The 1930s? The 1950s? The majority of people who raise children outside of cults, out here in the wilds of "present day America" with the rest of us, are doing just fine, thank you.

People seem to be conflicted. They don't want to support negligent child molesting cult leaders, that would be too creepy, but they SURE don't want to support the goverment's right to intervene. That's even WORSE.

If an individual family was reported or found to be involved in something like this, where two or three minors had been impregnated by adults, and the parents or guardians responsible for them were charged with neglect, or rape, or abuse, or brainwashing them into some theistic cult that practices polygamy, few here would have a problem with the State Authorities Intervening.

Wouldn't their "civil rights" be just as precious, and just as violated if it was just one small family? Or is State Authority viewed as "civil rights violators" for removing the minors because it's multiple cases instead of just one case? Or is it because those being charged have the cloak of religion to hide behind?

Clearly, the only reason people are troubled about rights violations is because it involves hundreds of minors, all at once. Then it's alarming. The State's being far too authoritarian and overzealous, violating their rights. If it was the same exact crimes were investigated involving only a handful of adults, and a handful of children, no problem. Or, a hundred cases individually, involving dozens of different families, over a period of five years, no problem. then no one is disturbed by the State's intervention. Even if it still adds up to five hundred minors.

I think the issue of finding foster care, or mandating temporary government care for three kids during an investigation doesn't bother anybody, it only bothers people because the numbers are so large and it's all from one group. Otherwise, an individual case is an individual case, even when there's multiple individual cases all at once. There's no legal difference.
Reply
#10
You realize it's Shakeman you're attempting to engage in debate, do you not? He doesn't respond or debate. He just posts.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)