Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Now where was I?
#1
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packag...55,00.html
Reply
#2
Reply
#3
that's one of the dumbest lists I've seen in a long time - the writer is a moran.
Reply
#4
Reply
#5
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packag...48,00.html

http://www.time.com/time/specials/packag...51,00.html

http://www.time.com/time/specials/packag...49,00.html

why did Betamax make that list? it's common knowledge (or should be) that it was better than VHS in all ways, except for market saturation.
Reply
#6
decay wrote:
why did Betamax make that list? it's common knowledge (or should be) that it was better than VHS in all ways, except for market saturation.

Try to fit a 2-hour movie on an original beta tape.
Reply
#7
Doc wrote:
[quote=decay]
why did Betamax make that list? it's common knowledge (or should be) that it was better than VHS in all ways, except for market saturation.

Try to fit a 2-hour movie on an original beta tape.
good point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videotape_f....S._market

US consumers wanted to record TV shows. i didn't realize that the yardstick was a football game!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)