![]() |
LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... (/showthread.php?tid=33334) |
Re: LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... - incognegro - 05-16-2007 I just joined up at http://forums.macnn.com/marketplace/ (MacNN marketplace) Let's all go there for a while & see what happens. I've got 20 GB iPods, a blue 2nd gen nano 4 GB, and a 30 GB 5G video iPod, among other things. Looking for a Pismo logic board and a good battery or two. ![]() Re: LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... - clay - 05-16-2007 wow, that's LAME. It's been a useful place to unload some old equipment for me in the past, but I have noticed the new rules put into place recently, and thought they were kind of dumb. >people had to include their city, state, and zip code. This is mostly redundant and as a zip code can cover both city and state. Exactly. I've listed my zip with all items for sale all the time. I can see how that could be an important bit of info for people to figure shipping, but that doesn't really tell me anything about the trustworthiness of the buyer or seller. You know what, my zip code is 22801. Good luck finding me even in a small city of 50,000. Re: LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... - The Grim Ninja - 05-16-2007 Well, I couldn't resist... Here's my reply to the list/rules/nanny. My message to LEMSwap wrote: Re: LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... - clay - 05-16-2007 great email, Grim! Re: LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... - Harbourmaster - 05-16-2007 Unfortunately your wasting your breath with Paul, he is a first rate moron. If you want to gripe about something on LemSwap, and have it handled in an adult fashion, you should direct your emails to Kyle: pixie at speakeasy dot net Re: LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... - The Grim Ninja - 05-16-2007 I remembered one of the LEM nannies being pretty idiotic at times, but couldn't remember who. I haven't bothered to learn all the nannies by name/habit. I had suspected it might have been Kyle as he was the one posting all the City/State/Zip reminders. Either way, the e-mail was sent to all members, so someone will read it. There are a few people suspecting that the e-mail from Paul isn't real. Either way, the City/State/Zip requirement is useless, I just wanted an excuse to break the silence. Re: LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... - M A V I C - 05-16-2007 From the Google Groups ToS: you agree that when using the Service, you will not: [...] post messages [...] prohibited by the Group owner. That's the closest thing to a leg they have to stand on. The list owner's rights do not include the ability to impost monetary fines. The rest of the groups rules pretty much go out the window, as the user does not have to see them or agree to them in order to join the list. They need something in the signup process that says "by using the group you agree to the rules at..." The best LEM can do is say that something you post is prohibited by the group and ban you for that. If you really want to make yourself heard, it might be worth contacting Google and pointing out how LEM is trying to profit in such a sneaky manner. Re: LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... - cbelt3 - 05-16-2007 woo- good point. That would get the group disposed of in a heart beat. Which would be a pity, but eh. Re: LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... - Carthaigh - 05-17-2007 The cosmic ballet continues. Re: LEM Swaplist rules/Nannies are really going overboard... - The Grim Ninja - 05-17-2007 Figured I'd post an update to clear things up sorta... A while after I posted my response, Dan (owner) posted a reply to the thread. He replied to my paragraph about the city/state being redundant and said agreed, but said it wasn't pointless as it let people know when local pickup would work. I don't see how a zip code doesn't do the same thing.. He proceeded to thank Paul, the nanny. Later, Paul commented that it was indeed a spoof and was being looked into. Between these were postings critiquing other responses for not having a sense of humor or agreeing that the City/State/Zip requirement was redundant and useless. Before posting, I did anticipate the nanny posting to be spoofed, but wanted to use it as an excuse to critique the new rules. Overall, I think everything may be ignored. Sometimes I have to wonder if they give any consideration to their rules and policies. I may be writing a nanny directly in the future. There are ways to help avoid scammers, but the ideas they've run with so far aren't going to work. |