+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: "Bobby" Jindal (/showthread.php?tid=73106)
Re: "Bobby" Jindal - $tevie - 02-27-2009
Often Imitated, Never Duplicated.
Re: "Bobby" Jindal - RgrF - 02-27-2009
Soon to be cloned.
Re: "Bobby" Jindal - Black - 02-27-2009
$tevie wrote:If, however, Dakota was just posting to listen to himself talk then I apologize for the mistake.
[quote=Black]Wrong about what? Dakota is absolutely right here, mick e's posts in this thread do resemble bfd's style, and $tevie's response had little relevance.
$tevie,
You have to dig deep for the meaning in Dakota's posts.
Re: "Bobby" Jindal - Black - 02-27-2009
mick e wrote:mick e was the first bfd?
mick e was the first, fwiw.
Re: "Bobby" Jindal - kanesa - 02-27-2009
Black wrote:If, however, Dakota was just posting to listen to himself talk then I apologize for the mistake.
[quote=$tevie]
[quote=Black]Wrong about what? Dakota is absolutely right here, mick e's posts in this thread do resemble bfd's style, and $tevie's response had little relevance.
$tevie,
You have to dig deep for the meaning in Dakota's posts.
That's right. Dakota told me it takes 2 or 3 days to understand what she is saying. I really don't have the that kind of time. Say what you mean is my philosophy.
Re: "Bobby" Jindal - Mac1337 - 02-27-2009
$tevie wrote:
[quote=Black]Wrong about what? Dakota is absolutely right here, mick e's posts in this thread do resemble bfd's style, and $tevie's response had little relevance.
Why would he even bring it up unless he was implying something? What exactly is the purpose of commenting on mick e's writing style by referring to someone who barely posts here these days, thus rendering the reference obscure for some people not to mention rather pointless for the rest of us? And since when does Dakota write critiques of people's writing styles, anyhow? I am willing to bet Dakota was making a stab at guessing that they are the same person and that was why I responded the way I did. If, however, Dakota was just posting to listen to himself talk then I apologize for the mistake.
You seem irritable today.
Re: "Bobby" Jindal - DCrunch - 02-28-2009
mick e wrote:
Anybody watch this dork's rebuttal? He's the "shining hope" of the republican party.
Without going into the astounding levels of hypocrisy and wrongheaded rhetoric dispensed by the Louisiana Governor, mick e will opt for a more personal observation.
He closed his eyes and saw Kenneth The NBC Page from "30 Rock". Only without the prescience or incisiveness.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC8z4ksgIlA
That you don't like him tells a lot, especially since you think Obama is so great.
Re: "Bobby" Jindal - $tevie - 02-28-2009
Black wrote: $tevie,
You have to dig deep for the meaning in Dakota's posts.
Whoops, I forgot to bring my proctoscope.
Re: "Bobby" Jindal - mick e - 02-28-2009
mick e never said he didn't like "Bobby".
He seems kind of awesome in a saturday morning cartoon kind of way.