![]() |
Woohoo! Halfway there! - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: Woohoo! Halfway there! (/showthread.php?tid=157011) |
Woohoo! Halfway there! - bazookaman - 08-30-2013 Re: this thread Data copied: 3.00 TB Time elapsed: 50:03:05 Re: Woohoo! Halfway there! - MGS_forgot_password - 08-30-2013 Livin on a prayer! Re: Woohoo! Halfway there! - Paul F. - 08-30-2013 FIFTY hours? Wow... and I thought an old FW400 drive I had was slow! Re: Woohoo! Halfway there! - OWC Larry - 08-30-2013 Hey - that's what ya get with a CCC block by block copy over fw800 Read to Mac via mini fw800 port Back out same port to 2nd drive in chain Already fw800 divided by 2 + oveehead since read and write via block copy not simultaneous flow and over same fw800 port regardless too It's not the drive's fault ![]() Re: Woohoo! Halfway there! - Black - 08-30-2013 OWC Larry wrote: C(-)ris called it, as usual. Re: Woohoo! Halfway there! - bazookaman - 08-30-2013 So here is a hypothetical. WOuld it have been faster if I connected one drive to the FW800 port on the Mini and the other drive to the FW800 port on my Apple Display? That one is running through Thunderbolt right? Would that make a difference? Re: Woohoo! Halfway there! - JoeH - 08-30-2013 bazookaman wrote: Possibly, as the data would be going over two separate buses. Re: Woohoo! Halfway there! - bazookaman - 08-30-2013 JoeH wrote: Possibly, as the data would be going over two separate buses. Well I stopped it and did that first thing this AM. It did indeed make a LITTLE difference. At least based on my crude maths. Oh well, even a little faster is still faster. Re: Woohoo! Halfway there! - NewtonMP2100 - 08-31-2013 ....take my hand....we'll make it I swear.....??? |