![]() |
RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) (/showthread.php?tid=190474) Pages:
1
2
|
RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) - pRICE cUBE - 04-26-2016 http://slickdeals.net/?sdtrk=ipad&api_key_id=4672654&pno=192618&lno=1&trd=BuyDig%2Bvia%2BeBay%2Bcom&afsrc=1&mon=1&ref=1 The lens is fine but the box is dented. Who cares, right? Lens is fine. I expect this to go fast. In Nikon, canon, and Sony Alpha mounts. Nikon D7200 refurb for $700 http://slickdeals.net/?sdtrk=ipad&api_key_id=4672654&pno=192554&lno=1&trd=BuyDig%2Bvia%2BeBay&afsrc=1&mon=1&ref=1 Re: RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) - pRICE cUBE - 04-26-2016 Gareth reports some of the people may not be getting "dented boxes". Gareth wrote: Re: RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) - Gareth - 04-26-2016 And while this lens has been a similar price after rebate, keep in mind that it's been a rather hefty $300/350ish rebate, so this is a great price without dealing with that. Re: RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) - pRICE cUBE - 04-26-2016 Gareth, your assessment on the lens is the same as mine. 500 and 550mm are very good. I tend to stay away from 600mm. It isn't terrible but it isn't as good as 500-550mm. You won't miss much not zooming it all the way out to 600mm. I have been able to shoot amateur daytime sports with this lens on a Nikon D3 and D800 and it has done a fine job. Is it anything like the 400mm 2.8 or 200-400mm lenses I have shot with? No, but for $679 no rebate it is great for getting a lot of reach for not a lot of money. Re: RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) - Billybob - 04-26-2016 Yes, this is a very nice lens. It gives you 90-95% of the IQ of the Sigma Sport 150-600mm for about 1/3 the price. However, I'm waiting for Sigma and/or Tamron to come out with a 500 f/4 or 600 f/5.6 to compete with the Canikon exotic primes. I'd be willing to pay up to $3500 for one! Re: RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) - MEG - 04-26-2016 Dammm you Price Cube...ordered... ![]() Re: RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) - Spiff - 04-26-2016 Well, the link takes me to eBay which has it for $989. Oh well. Ya snooze, ya lose Edit: Oh wait, I just found it by searching slick deals. Wonder why the link took me to eBay directly and showed it as $989? Maybe I'm not supposed to buy this lens... Edit: Nope. When I click the deal, its back to eBay for $989. Dern the luck. Re: RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) - mattkime - 04-26-2016 Its cheaper to run right up to whatever you need to photograph! :poke: Re: RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) - AllGold - 04-26-2016 Billybob wrote: I rented the Sigma Sport once. That thing is a beast! Larger and heavier than the non-Sport version. For image quality it was pretty good but not up to the Canon L standard. Like the Tamron, I found it was better up to about 500mm. Sigma makes a 500/4.5. If you shoot Nikon, I have heard good things about their new 200-500. For Canon shooters, the 100-400L version II is pretty awesome (and relatively affordable unlike their 200-400L). And for either, Sigma makes a 400/5.6 fixed that can be found used for $200-$300 that is about 96% as sharp as the Canon 400/5.6L. Re: RUN YOU FLIPPING FOOLS, Tamron 150-600mm $679 NEW, NO REBATES (box dented) - Billybob - 04-26-2016 AllGold wrote: I rented the Sigma Sport once. That thing is a beast! Larger and heavier than the non-Sport version. For image quality it was pretty good but not up to the Canon L standard. Like the Tamron, I found it was better up to about 500mm. Sigma makes a 500/4.5. If you shoot Nikon, I have heard good things about their new 200-500. For Canon shooters, the 100-400L version II is pretty awesome (and relatively affordable unlike their 200-400L). And for either, Sigma makes a 400/5.6 fixed that can be found used for $200-$300 that is about 96% as sharp as the Canon 400/5.6L. I have the 200-500, and everything you hear about it is true. Some say the Sigma Sport is slightly better, but when I tested my 200-500 against the Sport, the Nikon was slightly better (really, you could only see a difference on extreme pixel peeping). Regardless, I'm greedy and would love a faster, affordable, and better prime that I can afford. Is the current Sigma 500mm prime close to the Canikon exotics? If so, then I might take a look. You're right that the Sigma Sport is a beast. I tried it for a week and convinced myself that I could handle it if it improved on my Nikon. It didn't, so back it went. Perhaps I got a poor copy (and my Nikon is a really good one). Regardless, at this level, I suspect differences are minute to quite small. |