Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Real versus Imagined Wealth Distribution in the U.S."
#11
Ted King wrote: So who do you suppose ended up with the added income created by those productivity increases if it wasn't wage earners?

Clearly a rhetorical question since the answer lies within the first graphic you posted, though I'm sure there are a lot of people who look at threads like this whose minds cloud over when graphs and numbers appear. There are many obvious answers to economic questions available (i.e. the ones in this thread) that much of the voting populace never sees or understands because they are captivated by propaganda and are not educated. I think it behooves the republicans to keep as much of the populace uneducated and distracted so that they won't see the men behind the curtain. In some ways, the founding fathers had the right idea, severely limiting who had the right to vote, though the corruption inherent in such a scheme is impractical in the long run.
Reply
#12
Thus the right wing approach to "starve the beast" (government) and then blame teacher unions for the dumbing down of America. It fits their macro agenda to have an undereducated populace.
Reply
#13
Interesting that the spread between productivity and wages really took off when Reagan was elected - 1980.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)