Posts: 40,656
Threads: 1,025
Joined: May 2025
Since Cingular isn't subsidizing the cost of the iPhone, I don't see how they can justify a 2 year agreement. With Sprint and the others, you agree to the 1 or 2 year agreement because they're paying for the phone for you to a degree.
So the 2 year agreement is the first ripoff.
Those rates suck. I get 1100 minutes, unlimited text messages and mobile to mobile, nights starting at 7 for just $66 dollars total with Sprint. That includes an extra line and phone.
Posts: 9,401
Threads: 458
Joined: May 2025
Whoops, wrong thread (how the heck did I do that?).
Posts: 13,816
Threads: 1,151
Joined: Jun 2025
Reputation:
0
[quote vision63]Since Cingular isn't subsidizing the cost of the iPhone, I don't see how they can justify a 2 year agreement. With Sprint and the others, you agree to the 1 or 2 year agreement because they're paying for the phone for you to a degree.
So the 2 year agreement is the first ripoff.
I agree that there is no good reason to require a contract. The not-good reasons, in no particular order, are:
* AT&T feels like it.
* AT&T can get away with it.
* We've become accustomed to being locked into a contract. Too few of us are noticing that there's no reason for a contract since there is no price subsidy and saying "Hey, what's the deal here?"
* Many of the people who DO realize there's no good reason for a contract are too excited about the iPhone to exercise good judgement.
If the majority of those who are wetting themselves over the iPhone would stop for a minute and refuse to buy an iPhone unless it comes free of a contract then the problem would be solved. But that's not going to happen.