Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something

[Black]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091202/ap_o...ted_guests

Their whole statement: "I can tell you we did not party-crash."

(OK, so tell me . . .)

[Seacrest]

Was looking for Tiger Woods.
Leaving disappointed.

[mattkime]

I'd prefer we simply ignored them, although i realize thats not remotely possible.

[$tevie]

mattkime wrote:
I'd prefer we simply ignored them, although i realize thats not remotely possible.

I know! We are giving them exactly what they want.

[Doc]

What's the problem?

Their explanation seems plausible and excusable.

'Looks like the Secret Service had a security-lapse. 'Nice that they've caught it and are tightening security at future functions.

End of story.

[Seacrest]

$tevie wrote:
[quote=mattkime]
I'd prefer we simply ignored them, although i realize thats not remotely possible.

I know! We are giving them exactly what they want.
Who?

[$tevie]

-D

[Black]

Doc wrote:
What's the problem?

Their explanation seems plausible and excusable.

'Looks like the Secret Service had a security-lapse. 'Nice that they've caught it and are tightening security at future functions.

End of story.

So, a fun game with no legal consequences for others who want to enter the White House uninvited?

[Black]

$tevie wrote:
[quote=mattkime]
I'd prefer we simply ignored them, although i realize thats not remotely possible.

I know! We are giving them exactly what they want.
This post is what's going to sustain them for the next few hours.

[Mac1337]

It is amazing how many doors open up for you if you are tall, thin and blonde.