Posts: 8,440
Threads: 599
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
0
I think a lot of things were at play in the Bush admin not catching him:
lack of cooperation from frenemies like Pakistan, poor intelligence causing them to look in the wrong places, general lack of focus due to competing foreign policy initiatives like Iraq, and perhaps too lack of will. None of it worked in their favor, that's for sure.
Posts: 31,030
Threads: 2,688
Joined: May 2025
Yes, a lot of things, but none so much as the overriding feeling that offing OBL would have taken the wind out of the Iraq and Patriot Act sails.
Posts: 7,265
Threads: 745
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation:
0
Considering the huge amount of information gained from the raid on Bin Laden's compound, how can the Bush Administration argue that it was trying to keep us safe? Did they not consider the information they could get from finding Bin Laden?
The disruption in Al Qaeda's activities alone is worth the price of admission on that raid. Look for more raids soon.
Posts: 57,781
Threads: 5,856
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
2
Yes, President Obama is a much more militarily aggressive president than Bush.....
Oh.. wait... :confused:
Posts: 15,647
Threads: 1,310
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
0
Now I understand how a Democrat could drop the A-bomb on Japan. Libs can be very vicious if it is their man who is doing it.
Posts: 46,542
Threads: 2,629
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Only stupid people fall for the old saw that Democrats won't wage war. A fourth grade history text book disproves it.
Posts: 15,647
Threads: 1,310
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
0
Actually they do, quite frequently in fact, and lose most of them.