Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Truth to Power"-- Wright speaks out
#1
Energizing article.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/2...9211.shtml

Rev. Wright Fights Back
Obama's Ex-Pastor Defends Controversial Statements, Says Criticism Over Sermons Is Attack On Black Church

WASHINGTON, April 28, 2008

(CBS/AP) In a defiant appearance before the Washington media, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright said Monday that criticism surrounding his fiery sermons is an attack on the black church and rejected those who have labeled him unpatriotic.

"I served six years in the military," Barack Obama's longtime pastor said. "Does that make me patriotic? How many years did (Vice President Dick) Cheney serve?"

Wright spoke at the National Press Club before the Washington media and a supportive audience of black church leaders beginning a two-day symposium.

He said the black church tradition is not bombastic or controversial, but different and misunderstood by the "dominant culture" in the United States.

He said his Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago has a long history of liberating the oppressed by feeding the hungry, supporting recovery for the addicted and helping senior citizens in need. He said congregants have fought in the military, including in Afghanistan and Iraq.

"My goddaughter's unit just arrived in Iraq this week while those who call me unpatriotic have used their positions of privilege to avoid military service while sending over 4,000 American boys and girls to die over a lie," he said.

Wright said he hopes the controversy will have a positive outcome and spark an honest dialogue about race in America. Wright says black church traditions are still "invisible" to many Americans, as they have been throughout the country's history.

He said he hopes "the most recent attack on the black church - it is not an attack on Jeremiah Wright - it's an attack on the black church," he said to applause, "just might mean that the reality of the African-American church will no longer be invisible."

"Rev. Wright is calling for a continued conversation about race and religion, one which Obama himself began in a much-heralded speech last month," said CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs. "But it's quite a different discussion when led by a preacher and not a presidential candidate and one that can’t be helpful to Obama's campaign." (Read more from Ververs on Wright.)

Videos clips of Wright's sermons, circulated widely on television and the Internet, knocked Obama's presidential campaign off-stride. The Illinois Democrat distanced himself from the comments of Wright, whom he has known for 20 years.

In a sermon days after the Sept. 11 attacks, Wright said "America's chickens are coming home to roost" after the United States dropped atomic bombs on Japan and "supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans."

Asked about some of the comments after the terrorist attacks, Wright challenged the reporter questioning him.

"Have you heard the whole sermon? No? The whole sermon?" he responded. When the reporter shook her head, he said, "That nullifies that question."

He said criticism comes from people who only have heard sound bites playing repeatedly on television and have never listened to his entire sermons.

Wright said he's told Obama that if he is elected in November and is inaugurated in January, "I'm coming after you." He said that's because his differences are not with the American people, but U.S. policies.

"Whether he gets elected or not, I'm still going to have to be answerable to God on November 5 and January 21," Wright said.

Obama was asked yesterday if he believes Wright's recent appearances will hurt his chances of winning upcoming primaries, reports CBS News reporter Maria Gavrilovic. Obama dodged the question, telling reporters, "I’ll let you prognosticate." (Read more about the Obama campaign response.)

In an interview with Fox News Sunday, Obama said he did not discourage Wright from making appearances and understands why his desire to speak.
"Look, he is a former pastor of mine. He is somebody who has obviously been the subject of, you know, some pretty sharp attacks over the last. And it's understandable that somebody after an entire career of service would want to defend themselves."

Last night, Wright told a 10,000-strong audience in Detroit that his critics get it wrong when they call him divisive and polarizing.

"I describe the conditions in this country," Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., the former pastor of Obama, said during the NAACP's 53rd annual Fight for Freedom Fund Dinner.

"I'm not here for political reasons. I'm not a politician. I know that fact will surprise many of you because many in the corporate-owned media made it seem like I am running for the Oval Office," Wright said. "I am not running for the Oval Office. I've been running for Jesus a long, long time and I'm not tired yet."

Receiving a lengthy and loud standing ovation, Wright followed in the footsteps of Obama, President Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton in his speech at the event, a $150-a-plate fundraiser billed as the largest sit-down dinner in America.

Obama, who is vying with Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination, distanced himself from Wright after publicity over the minister's sharp criticism of America's racial history and government policies.

The Rev. Wendell Anthony, president of the Detroit branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, stirred the crowd with an animated introduction to Wright. He let the audience know, among other things, that Wright speaks five languages and is an Egyptologist, writer, author, family man and "innovator and sustainer of the word of God."

"No this ain't about Barack Obama. This ain't about Hillary Rodham Clinton. This ain't about John McCain. It's bigger than all of them," Anthony said.

"This is about the African-American church. This is about our people. This is about our right to speak truth to power."

Anthony said at a press conference before the dinner that he was excited to invite the "hottest brother in America right now - outside of Barack Obama."

Wright, who is retiring as pastor of the 8,000-member Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, followed the dinner's theme of "A Change is Gonna Come."

He drew numerous contrasts between racial and ethnic groups in language, music and other aspects of American culture. He danced, beat-boxed and even sang an aria from the podium in the massive exhibition hall that served as an impromptu pulpit to make his points.

"In the past, we were taught to see others who are different as somehow being deficient," Wright said.

But he also responded to Republican Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson, who called Wright "divisive" during an April 18 forum attended by the leaders of Detroit and Wayne, Macomb and Oakland counties.

"I am not one of the most divisive" black spiritual leaders, he said. "Tell him the word is `descriptive."'

Wright also called out Detroit political consultant Sam Riddle, who told The Associated Press last week that Wright's presence in Detroit would be "polarizing."

"I'm not here to address an analyst's opinion or a county executive's point of view. I'm here to address your 2008 theme," Wright said, without calling Patterson or Riddle by name.

"I believe that a change is going to come because many of us are committed to changing how we see other people who are different."

Wright became an issue in the presidential race in March after the circulation of videos of old sermons in which he accused the U.S. government of racism and accused it of flooding black neighborhoods with drugs.

In a sermon days after the Sept. 11 attacks, Wright said "America's chickens are coming home to roost" after the United States dropped atomic bombs on Japan and "supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans."

The videos, circulated widely on television and the Internet, knocked Obama's presidential campaign off-stride. The Illinois Democrat distanced himself from the comments of Wright, whom he has known for 20 years.

In an interview aired Friday on PBS, Wright said publicizing portions of old sermons was unfair and "made me the target of hatred."

Gwendolyn Powell, 62, a retired Detroit teacher, said she is a lifetime member of the NAACP and a supporter of Wright and his teachings. She endorsed his message of tolerance but said the criticism he has faced was regrettable.

"It's the American way, if you want," she said. "There's a need to make him deficient rather than different."

Sunday's event drew local and national clergy members and dignitaries, including Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm and several members of the state's congressional delegation. Hollywood actors attending the dinner - Vivica A. Fox, Anthony Anderson, Hill Harper and Morris Chestnut - were loudly applauded when they were introduced.

Anthony said the local NAACP reached out to Wright to allow him a fair hearing acknowledging his 40-plus years in the ministry.

"I'm a clergyman. I'm a pastor," Anthony said. "It's about speaking truth to power. We must not allow anyone to dictate what can come from the pulpit of the African-American church - any church."
Reply
#2
I didn't see the National Press Club appearance (don't know if it was broadcast) but I saw the NCAAP speech, it was truly bizarre, but entertaining. His ideas are more separatist than I realized. But it may have been a factor of the audience he was addressing. I'd be curious to see the other appearances. Though I'd be equally happy (and so would Obama's campaign, I imagine) if he wasn't actively seeking the spotlight. Any time he opens his mouth it gives opponents ammunition and Democrat supporters a headache. Which isn't so say I think he should avoid public appearances or mute his opinions, but it's become a sideshow. It promotes a spirit of embattled solidarity and adversarial honor for a certain sector of loyal supporters, but doesn't convince the mainstream of anything, except "why is he on the news again?"
Reply
#3
[quote guitarist] His ideas are more separatist than I realized.
I'm not getting that. Can you give any specific examples?
Reply
#4
Here's a little gem for those who can never get enough of the 50-something white male perspective:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/2...0606.shtml
Reply
#5
I wish I had the transcript. It's probably out there, maybe I'll look for it. Keep in mind he was speaking to the NAACP, a specific kind of audience. I'm not trying to hold the speech to a standard that's not consistent with the context and audience. He was making the case that African American children learn differently. His case was built on a peculiar right-brain, left-brain argument, explaining how African language, music, and culture evolved one way, and white European culture evolved another way, using examples in beat accents in musical rhythm, language orientation, etc. Not new territory, but not the most enlightened or original approach to the subject, either.

To make his examples more entertaining, Wright made fun of Lyndon Johnson's, Ted Kennedy, and JFK's speaking styles, flamboyantly mocking their Boston and southern accents. (imagine Billy Graham or Pat Robertson mocking the way black people talk, from a podium at a formal dinner) Wright would break into song, or do imaginary dialogues to make his linguistic points. It was an extension of what stand-up comedians do but when comics do it, they're not pretending to be serious and academic about it. Wright was being academic and serious about it. The message was: "white people are this way, black people are this other way, we're fundamentally different".

My problem with the subject-object-oriented learning lecture, and the African and European Heritage lecture is that A. we're not in Africa, or Europe, we're in America. And B. black kids don't have some genetic brain variation that makes their cognitive development any different than Caucasian or Asian or Indian kids. We're all born here, and our brains aren't different. Whatever link we have to our European or African distant past is no more meaningful than the distant links other peoples have to their great great grandparent's homeland. It was almost as if he was rationalizing or excusing low performance, or challenging educational standards, because they were invented by white people to measure the intelligence of other white people.

I can't imagine a speaker with great grandparents from Brazil, Iceland, or Australia, making a case for how their children are educationally "misunderstood" because of some fundamental cognitive differences. His linguistics and music lecture seemed to suggest that these are innate genetic differences, and the White Power System can't measure it because it's using the wrong tools. I think that's baloney. Here I'm inclined to agree with Bill Cosby's critique of black leadership priorities, and Cosby's educational emphasis self-reliance and strong parental involvement, over quibbling about historic inequities or systemic flaws, while not completely invalid, it's just the wrong direction to go in, it's not productive. I thought the speech showcased Wright's divisive or separatist side. Mocking the way white people talk just made him look foolish.

At the risk of oversimplifying, the ongoing theme was "us" vs. "them". Those white people who came from Europe. This may be a popular theme in academia, but it's contrary to the message of equality and unity that most of us associate with spiritual and civic leaders. Having said all that, I don't mean to suggest Wright is under any obligation to be any different than he is, if this is his message, that's his message. And whether it's the right message or the wrong message isn't for me to decide. But that's what struck me about it, it was coming from a separatist school of thought, using examples that I thought had long ago been discredited as mumbo jumbo pseudo-scientific social theory.
Reply
#6
[quote Black Landlord]Here's a little gem for those who can never get enough of the 50-something white male perspective:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/2...0606.shtml
Hate to correct BL when he's on a roll, but...

how about the "Manhattan-Jewish-Yale-Law-Graduate-former-Kennedy-Speechwriter" point of view.

Jeff Greenfield has about as much in common with the average 50-something-white-male perspective as Snoop Dog has in common with Barbara Walters.
Reply
#7
Strange-- I though research did seem to support differences in the way our brains are wired (across various races).
There are plenty of undeniable differences in other physiology-- skin makeup, most obviously, but we're clearly affected differently by dietary differences, have markedly different risk factors for various diseases, do different things with body fat distribution, etc.
There are also significant differences in our cultures, even in homogenous borg-like America; to suggest that (for example) black folks have the same influences as white because we all live in the same country, and thus that the influence on our development is the same is just not kosher, and I can't see how it would be possible to hold this perception without extremely limited exposure to black culture(s).

In any event, maybe Wright's comments are not "productive"-- but as he said he's not in politics and he's not running for oval office. It ws very fair of you to give a nod to the audience for which this speech was intended-- a community leader takes a different focus when working to strengthen a community internally than when representing that community externally.
Reply
#8
[quote guitarist][quote Black Landlord]Here's a little gem for those who can never get enough of the 50-something white male perspective:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/2...0606.shtml
Hate to correct BL when he's on a roll, but...

how about the "Manhattan-Jewish-Yale-Law-Graduate-former-Kennedy-Speechwriter" point of view.

Jeff Greenfield has about as much in common with the average 50-something-white-male perspective as Snoop Dog has in common with Barbara Walters.
OK, yeah, I know-- but he's stuck to that same mainstream white guy reaction of "but--but-but-- what about the offensive soundbytes??Completely unrepentant!!"
Reply
#9
[quote Black Landlord]
OK, yeah, I know-- but he's stuck to that same mainstream white guy reaction of "but--but-but-- what about the offensive soundbytes??Completely unrepentant!!"
I see your point, but limiting that reaction to only coming from "middle-aged, middle-class white guys" might actually be wrong. It wouldn't surprise me if a lot of black people, or poor people, or hispanics, or other non-mainstream or disenfranchised groups--who also happen to be patriotic and share common ideals--ALSO find Wright's opinions and unrepentant stance to be offensive.

I think it's why I commented earlier that this media attention and unrepentant posturing is scoring big points inside a certain community of like-minded loyalists, "strengthening the base", so to speak.

But it further alienates the mainstream, many of whom who are turned off by the *^&#I!! America!" coming from someone who has prospered and lived comfortably in America, more comfortably than most of us have. It's offensive to other minority groups who aren't particularly loyal or allied with this core base. Meaning, not just mainstream white people are turned off by it.

If Wright's had opportunities to reach across the divide and promote unity, he's elected not to take those opportunities, preferring to rally his base, and pose as a victim of media misunderstanding instead.
Reply
#10
To quote Wright, did you listen to that whole sermon?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)