10-18-2008, 08:34 AM
Way back in the golden days of Macintosh right about the time when Steve Jobs was replaced by John Sculley, a murmur ran through the masses and the murmur went like this:
Steve Jobs' ego is destroying Apple.
And Jobs was replaced and Apple made better and better computers. And then they made worse and worse computers. And then Michael Spindler's mismanagement drove the company nearly to ruin. And Gil Amelio considered selling Apple to Sony.
And the people spake thusly: "What if Jobs came back?"
And the general conclusion was that Steve Jobs was too unstable to run the company for very long, but bringing him back for 4-5 years could rejuvenate the company and bring us to a second golden age.
And lo, Steve Jobs came back to the mother company.
And lo, he has been there for 11 years and indeed, Apple has flourished.
And lo, he has an ailment that makes the stock price plummet when his photo hits the news.
And lo, what Jobs giveth, he taketh away. He has given us iPods and taken away our FireWire.
Consumer Macs are not unlike the glitzy Vaio now: pretty, but overpriced and short on substance.
With little to sustain it but the OS, which now runs on 3rd party computers, in what direction is Steve Jobs guiding us? Is it not to sure oblivion, awash in a sea of shiny indistinguishable PC's?
Is it not time to seek his true successor?
Steve Jobs' ego is destroying Apple.
And Jobs was replaced and Apple made better and better computers. And then they made worse and worse computers. And then Michael Spindler's mismanagement drove the company nearly to ruin. And Gil Amelio considered selling Apple to Sony.
And the people spake thusly: "What if Jobs came back?"
And the general conclusion was that Steve Jobs was too unstable to run the company for very long, but bringing him back for 4-5 years could rejuvenate the company and bring us to a second golden age.
And lo, Steve Jobs came back to the mother company.
And lo, he has been there for 11 years and indeed, Apple has flourished.
And lo, he has an ailment that makes the stock price plummet when his photo hits the news.
And lo, what Jobs giveth, he taketh away. He has given us iPods and taken away our FireWire.
Consumer Macs are not unlike the glitzy Vaio now: pretty, but overpriced and short on substance.
With little to sustain it but the OS, which now runs on 3rd party computers, in what direction is Steve Jobs guiding us? Is it not to sure oblivion, awash in a sea of shiny indistinguishable PC's?
Is it not time to seek his true successor?