02-28-2014, 08:30 PM
What a ridiculous article.
The author is feigning outrage that "liberals" have brought pressure on a particular piece of legislation, while "liberals" have brought less pressure on a COMPLETELY UNRELATED ISSUE in ANOTHER STATE, thus supporting a ridiculous strawman he seems to have constructed regarding how "liberals" choose causes.
This is what passes for journalism these days? How did that piece of tripe even get past the editor? I can imagine the editor saying something like "We haven't published an article about the hypocrisy of liberals lately...get something on my desk by friday, and make sure it has a link to that gay thing in Arizona that's getting a lot of press".
The author is feigning outrage that "liberals" have brought pressure on a particular piece of legislation, while "liberals" have brought less pressure on a COMPLETELY UNRELATED ISSUE in ANOTHER STATE, thus supporting a ridiculous strawman he seems to have constructed regarding how "liberals" choose causes.
This is what passes for journalism these days? How did that piece of tripe even get past the editor? I can imagine the editor saying something like "We haven't published an article about the hypocrisy of liberals lately...get something on my desk by friday, and make sure it has a link to that gay thing in Arizona that's getting a lot of press".