08-12-2018, 07:16 PM
Sam like couple others here have the same running excuse for their constant examples of bad judgment as
being "fooled" by the candidates that are quite obviously bad choices, but for the letter designating their party affiliation. Cruz was the way out slimiest candidate during the election Sam picked him as hers.
It required exceptionally bad judgement, outstandingly so, to pick him.
What evidence does anybody has that her judgement improved so dramatically since then.
I do understand why bringing this inconvenient example bothers you, because it places you in the same category, using the very same criteria, repeating the same mistakes over and over again. And as badly as Sam.
Your lesser evil is still evil...
I will probably vote for Beto when we come to that point, in spite of what Sam may go for....
being "fooled" by the candidates that are quite obviously bad choices, but for the letter designating their party affiliation. Cruz was the way out slimiest candidate during the election Sam picked him as hers.
It required exceptionally bad judgement, outstandingly so, to pick him.
What evidence does anybody has that her judgement improved so dramatically since then.
I do understand why bringing this inconvenient example bothers you, because it places you in the same category, using the very same criteria, repeating the same mistakes over and over again. And as badly as Sam.
Your lesser evil is still evil...
I will probably vote for Beto when we come to that point, in spite of what Sam may go for....