10-18-2008, 07:12 PM
threeprong wrote:
The one he faisl on is "Identifying and mentoring a qualified successor.
None of us knows whether he has failed in that task.
I think he has at least several excellent candidates lined up.
If it's Schiller, then Schiller, it's a little worrying...
I doubt it's Phil.
It its Cook, he needs more air time.
Maybe so but I thought he did a fine job at the recent MacBook presentation.
WHo is it? Nopbody seems obvious and so that's the problem.
Not at all. Neither Apple nor Jobs is obligated to publicly state who his successor at some unknown point in the future will be. For that matter, nor is Jobs required to publicly disclose his health status.
BTW, does anyone here know the health status of any other CEO of a large corporation? No? I guess all those other corporations aren't playing fair either...