07-31-2009, 01:19 AM
thermarest wrote:
How can Nikon charge $2400 for a lens when Canon's very excellent version is $1600?
Hmmm...maybe its because they have the D300, which I am very seriously thinking of replacing my 40D with. Too bad they don't have a 400 f5.6 or 70-200 f4
I suspect after the dust settles -- a year, maybe two -- its street price will be competitive with the Canon. The question is will it perform as well as the Canon, and when will they come out with 70-200 f/4 VR that competes with Canon's IS?