Posts: 22,262
Threads: 2,504
Joined: May 2025
...or so
says a jury in LA. Shocking, I know. But Apple seems to have somehow dodged this bullet. Whew!
This guy shoulda brought his case in East Texas. Juries will buy just about any story there.
Posts: 13,419
Threads: 602
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
That "reporter" should be fired. Did he actually write a story or just the headline and byline?
Posts: 22,262
Threads: 2,504
Joined: May 2025
I think it's spare because it's breaking news. I don't see any other articles mentioning the verdict yet.
Posts: 13,419
Threads: 602
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Rushing to be first to print is not an excuse for being ill written and lacking substance.
Posts: 21,452
Threads: 243
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation:
0
Tough case for the plaintiff since the IBM Simon predates 1997.
Edit: In fact, the Nokia 9000 communicator also predates the 1997 patent.
Posts: 21,452
Threads: 243
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation:
0
Huh, not sure what happened to my post. Totally garbled. If you prefer PAE, that's fine. Trolling still stinks. Microsoft has long operated with such disregard, but I was shocked when Apple jumped onboard the Lodsys, SCO, and similar business plan.
I would think we agree that the smartphone inventor plaintiff had long odds as smart phones predated his patent. I'm confused by this case. Which PAE was funding it?
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 175
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
My point is that the consortium you're referring to is not a patent troll. As the article I cited stated, "Generally not considered patent trolls are NPEs such as…licensing agents that offer enforcement and negotiation services on behalf of patent owners."