CEO Collects $142 Million Pay

[max]

Oh, good, I have not met one yet.
Please explain the "teabagger" logic of yours, Rolando.

And if you want to argue the logic of 100% taxation, how well that incentive works in real world of economics, I will be very happy to discuss it with you as soon as you can show me the example that did not result in every business fleeing that jurisdiction.....

[Lux Interior]

Rolando 2go wrote:
Teabagger logic!

The same logic that sets 91 = 100.

[max]

Nope.
From the economic view, not kindergarten 'rhytmetic you are are used to, an incentive to produce at 90% confiscatory rate of taxation is not much different than at a 100%.....

[Speedy]

max wrote:
Nope.
From the economic view, not kindergarten 'rhytmetic you are are used to, an incentive to produce at 90% confiscatory rate of taxation is not much different than at a 100%.....

Even though I disagree with you, there would still be no shortage of qualified candidates seeking those jobs.

[max]

Speedy wrote:
[quote=max]
Nope.
From the economic view, not kindergarten 'rhytmetic you are are used to, an incentive to produce at 90% confiscatory rate of taxation is not much different than at a 100%.....

Even though I disagree with you, there would still be no shortage of qualified candidates seeking those jobs. The jobs were not the point, the ability of the state to recapture the obscene payouts was.

Only an idiot would think that when faced with confiscation they will not devise an alternative method or a locale of their payout....

[Speedy]

max wrote:
[quote=Speedy]
[quote=max]
Nope.
From the economic view, not kindergarten 'rhytmetic you are are used to, an incentive to produce at 90% confiscatory rate of taxation is not much different than at a 100%.....

Even though I disagree with you, there would still be no shortage of qualified candidates seeking those jobs. The jobs were not the point, the ability of the state to recapture the obscene payouts was.

Only an idiot would think that when faced with confiscation they will not devise an alternative method or a locale of their payout....
Mitt Romney is a good example of moving money for tax purposes. But if they earn it here, tax it here and tax it at a high rate no matter in what form it is paid (stock options, etc.). Republicans will never let that happen.

[max]

We were talking about your idiotic "solution" of taxing at 100%, or nearly that.

And it was your guy, Obama, that rained the trillion dollars on Wall Street without attaching any strings to their salaries while he had an unprecedented chance to set a precedent.

You have this cretinic fixation on Republicans, Republicans, Republicans.
The last time I looked Obama was a Democrat and in fact there is not much difference between either, but you are one happy hypocrite, Speedy, enabling your group of thieves by pointing at another, while the first gang is stealing us naked.....

[Speedy]

Speaking of fixations, you seem to blame Pres. Obama for everything, except for cleaning up the mess left by Pres. Bush.

[max]

No, Speedy, you really do have a comprehension problem, I blame Obama for being Bush on steroids.

Bush 2.0

And what exactly do you think Obama cleaned up?
Wall Street?
Big Insurance?
Thieving Oligarchy?
Our overseas wars for oil?
Unemployment?
Economy?

Come Speedy, give us some of that cleanup you have running rampant through your fevered imagination....